United States v. John Wayne Lunsford

Fourth Circuit

United States v. John Wayne Lunsford

45 F.3d 428, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40400, 1994 WL 717717

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 29, 1994

Docket94-6909

StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 428 (United States v. John Wayne Lunsford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. John Wayne Lunsford, 45 F.3d 428, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40400, 1994 WL 717717 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

45 F.3d 428
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
John Wayne LUNSFORD, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6909.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 1994.
Decided: Dec. 29, 1994.

John Wayne Lunsford, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lunsford, Nos. CR-85-113-G; CA-93-482-2 (M.D.N.C. July 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

45 F.3d 428
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
John Wayne LUNSFORD, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6909.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 1994.
Decided: Dec. 29, 1994.

John Wayne Lunsford, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lunsford, Nos. CR-85-113-G; CA-93-482-2 (M.D.N.C. July 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F.3d 428, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40400, 1994 WL 717717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-wayne-lunsford-ca4-1994.