United States v. John Thomas Hall

Fourth Circuit

United States v. John Thomas Hall

38 F.3d 1213, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36654, 1994 WL 560683

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 14, 1994

Docket93-6297

StatusPublished

This text of 38 F.3d 1213 (United States v. John Thomas Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. John Thomas Hall, 38 F.3d 1213, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36654, 1994 WL 560683 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

38 F.3d 1213
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
John Thomas HALL, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6297.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted January 27, 1994.
Decided October 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-88-233)

John Thomas Hall, Appellant Pro Se.

William Corley Lucius, Asst. U.S. Atty., Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hall, No. CR-88-233 (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

38 F.3d 1213
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
John Thomas HALL, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6297.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted January 27, 1994.
Decided October 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-88-233)

John Thomas Hall, Appellant Pro Se.

William Corley Lucius, Asst. U.S. Atty., Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hall, No. CR-88-233 (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 F.3d 1213, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36654, 1994 WL 560683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-thomas-hall-ca4-1994.