United States v. John Mills

592 F. App'x 617
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 6, 2015
Docket13-10655
StatusUnpublished

This text of 592 F. App'x 617 (United States v. John Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. John Mills, 592 F. App'x 617 (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER ***

A federal jury found John Rowland Mills guilty of nine counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (2012), the federal wire fraud statute. The district court granted Mills’s motion for judgment of acquittal on eight of the nine counts, but affirmed as to one count, count fifteen. We address Mills’s *618 appeal in a separate memorandum disposition filed contemporaneously with this order.

The government initially filed a cross-appeal, but later withdrew it: “While the United States disagrees with the district court’s ruling, it has chosen not to challenge the result in the interest of judicial economy and the strength of its argument presented herein.” Letter from John S. Leonardo, AUSA, to Molly Dwyer, Clerk of the Court (Aug. 13, 2014), ECF No. 24. We therefore dismiss the government’s cross-appeal.

This order shall serve as the mandate of the court.

DISMISSED.

***

phis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 F. App'x 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-mills-ca9-2015.