United States v. John Lee Bowen
This text of 462 F.2d 347 (United States v. John Lee Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John Lee Bowen appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for violation of 21 U.S.C.. 176(a) and 21 U.S.C. 331 (q) (3) (B) (smuggling and transporting smuggled marijuana and possession of depressant and stimulant drugs).
While searching Bowen’s rented camper for aliens, Immigration Officer Ort-meier first smelled and then found in the camper nearly 356 pounds of marijuana bricks of the type and packaged in the manner that usually comes from Mexico, along with backpacking equipment and burlap bags marked Product of Mexico. One hundred fifty-eight benzedrine tablets were found in the pocket of a jacket in the cab of the camper.
Questions raised on appeal are whether the search and seizure were lawful, whether there was sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that the marijuana had been unlawfully imported by appellant and whether appellant knew it had been unlawfully imported when he transported it.
The search and seizure were plainly lawful. The circumstantial evidence of knowledge of unlawful importation on Count 2 of the Indictment, though not overwhelming, was clearly sufficient to support the jury verdict. The question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the smuggling charge of Count 1 need not be reached since the sentences on Counts 1 and 2 were identical and concurrent. United States v. Aranda, 9th Cir., 1972, 457 F. 2d 761.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
462 F.2d 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-lee-bowen-ca9-1972.