United States v. John Larry Leal
This text of 57 F.3d 1071 (United States v. John Larry Leal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
57 F.3d 1071
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John Larry LEAL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-2341.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 16, 1995.
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; MARTIN, Circuit Judge; SIMPSON*, District Judge.
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
The Hon. Charles R. Simpson, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F.3d 1071, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21010, 1995 WL 364237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-larry-leal-ca6-1995.