United States v. John L. Warren, Jr., David Defina, Des E. Shick and Thomas A. Warren
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion April 7, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 550 F.2d 219)
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORN-BERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINS-WORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application *328 of the United States for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause as to appellants John L. Warren, Jr. and Thomas A. Warren shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
558 F.2d 327 (United States v. John L. Warren, Jr., David Defina, Des E. Shick and Thomas A. Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.