United States v. John L. Battaglia

Ninth Circuit

United States v. John L. Battaglia

426 F.2d 894, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9086

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 1970

Docket25010

StatusPublished

This text of 426 F.2d 894 (United States v. John L. Battaglia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. John L. Battaglia, 426 F.2d 894, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9086 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Battaglia appeals from an order revoking probation. In essence, his argument is that the evidence of his violation of the. terms of his probation is so slight that we should hold that the trial judge abused his discretion. See Whitfield v. United States, 9 Cir., 1968, 401 F.2d 480, 482; Longknife v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 381 F.2d 17, 19. On this record, we cannot so hold. There is substantial evidence of repeated and' serious violations of the terms of Battaglia’s probation.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Battaglia appeals from an order revoking probation. In essence, his argument is that the evidence of his violation of the. terms of his probation is so slight that we should hold that the trial judge abused his discretion. See Whitfield v. United States, 9 Cir., 1968, 401 F.2d 480, 482; Longknife v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 381 F.2d 17, 19. On this record, we cannot so hold. There is substantial evidence of repeated and' serious violations of the terms of Battaglia’s probation.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

426 F.2d 894, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-l-battaglia-ca9-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack