United States v. John L. Battaglia

Ninth Circuit

United States v. John L. Battaglia

426 F.2d 894, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9086

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 25, 1970·No. 25010·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Battaglia appeals from an order revoking probation. In essence, his argument is that the evidence of his violation of the. terms of his probation is so slight that we should hold that the trial judge abused his discretion. See Whitfield v. United States, 9 Cir., 1968, 401 F.2d 480, 482; Longknife v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 381 F.2d 17, 19. On this record, we cannot so hold. There is substantial evidence of repeated and' serious violations of the terms of Battaglia’s probation.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Battaglia appeals from an order revoking probation. In essence, his argument is that the evidence of his violation of the. terms of his probation is so slight that we should hold that the trial judge abused his discretion. See Whitfield v. United States, 9 Cir., 1968, 401 F.2d 480, 482; Longknife v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 381 F.2d 17, 19. On this record, we cannot so hold. There is substantial evidence of repeated and' serious violations of the terms of Battaglia’s probation.

Affirmed.

United States v. John L. Battaglia, 426 F.2d 894, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9086 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

426 F.2d 894 (United States v. John L. Battaglia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related