United States v. John Fred Woolard and Dempsey A. Bruner
990 F.2d 819, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10320, 1993 WL 138785
Opinions
[820]*820ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion January 11, 1993, 5 Cir., 1993, 981 F.2d 756)
Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The judges in regular active service of this Court having been polled at the request of one of said judges and a majority of said judges not having voted in favor of it (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. John Fred Woolard and Dempsey A. Bruner, 990 F.2d 819, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10320, 1993 WL 138785 (5th Cir. 1993).
990 F.2d 819 (United States v. John Fred Woolard and Dempsey A. Bruner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Frank Serafini
167 F.3d 812 (Third Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Serafini
Third Circuit, 1999
United States v. Mary Rose Oakar and Joseph Demio
111 F.3d 146 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)
Leon Snipes v. George Detella, Doctor Ehrhardt, John L. Russian
95 F.3d 586 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Raymond D. Cheely, Jr. Douglas P. Gustafson
21 F.3d 914 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Buko v. American Medical Laboratories, Inc.
830 F. Supp. 899 (E.D. Virginia, 1993)
United States v. John Fred Woolard and Dempsey A. Bruner
990 F.2d 819 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)