United States v. John E. Tutchton

59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23205, 1995 WL 373267
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 1995·No. 95-6266·Published

Opinion

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John E. TUTCHTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6266.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 23, 1995.

John E. Tutchton, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Douglas Bennett, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Tutchton, Nos. CR-93-129-S; CA-94-3520 (D. Md. Jan. 3, 1995). Appellant's motion to expedite is now moot and is dismissed for that reason. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. John E. Tutchton, 59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23205, 1995 WL 373267 (4th Cir. 1995).

59 F.3d 168 (United States v. John E. Tutchton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.