United States v. John Doe

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. John Doe. Read the opinion of the Court — 962 F.3d 139
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2020·No. 19-6769·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6769

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN DOE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (7:01-cr-00027-BO-1)

Submitted: June 29, 2020 Decided: August 4, 2020

Before KING, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Doe, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Doe appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to seal. While this

appeal was pending, we set forth the relevant standard to apply and the interests to consider

when addressing motions such as Doe’s. See United States v. Doe, 962 F.3d 139, 145-53

(4th Cir. 2020). The district court did not have the benefit of our decision in Doe when

ruling on Doe’s motion. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand for

reconsideration in light of Doe. We deny Doe’s motions to seal the courtroom, to hold oral

argument, and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. John Doe, (4th Cir. 2020).

United States v. John Doe (United States v. John Doe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. John Doe
962 F.3d 139 (Fourth Circuit, 2020)