United States v. John Carroll Sox, United States of America v. Norman Lee Hairr
This text of 388 F.2d 988 (United States v. John Carroll Sox, United States of America v. Norman Lee Hairr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
388 F.2d 988
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
John Carroll SOX, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Norman Lee HAIRR, Appellant.
Nos. 11622, 11657.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Dec. 4, 1967.
Decided Jan. 11, 1968, Certiorari Denied April 22, 1968, See
88 S.Ct. 1417.
Kale R. Alexander, Columbia, S.C. (David A. Fedor, Columbia, S.C., on brief), for appellant in No. 11622.
J. Kenneth Rentiers, Charleston, S.C. (Court-appointed counsel), for appellant in No. 11657.
Thomas P. Simpson, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Terrell L. Glenn, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We find no illegality in the search and no error in the trial proceedings respecting proof and determination of the value of the stolen, transported goods.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
388 F.2d 988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-carroll-sox-united-states-of--ca4-1968.