United States v. John

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 12, 2002
Docket01-11020
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. John (United States v. John) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. John, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11020 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EGENESEE EVETTE JOHN, also known as Eginese John, also known as King, also known as Egenise John, also known as Esenesee John, also known as Esenesee King, also known as Egenesee King,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CR-361-ALL-D -------------------- April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Egenesee

Evette John has filed a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel

and a brief in support in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). John has received a copy of counsel’s

motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent

review of the record and counsel’s brief reveals no nonfrivolous

issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is excused from further

responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. John, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-ca5-2002.