United States v. John B. Kemmel
This text of 295 F.2d 712 (United States v. John B. Kemmel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
295 F.2d 712
UNITED STATES of America,
v.
John B. KEMMEL, Appellant.
No. 13543.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued July 24, 1961.
Decided Nov. 3, 1961, Rehearing Denied Dec. 5, 1961.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; John Wl Murphy, Judge.
Stanford Shmukler, Philadelphia, Pa. (Jacob Kossman, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Oliver Dibble, Washington, D.C. (Herbert J. Miller, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Daniel Jenkins, U.S. Atty., Middle Dist. of Pennsylvania, Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for United States.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully examined the record and have considered the arguments of appellant's counsel. We can find no substantial prejudicial error in the proceeding. Consequently the judgment of conviction will be affirmed D.C., 188 F.Supp. 736.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 F.2d 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-b-kemmel-ca3-1961.