United States v. John Arrington
This text of 21 F.3d 425 (United States v. John Arrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
21 F.3d 425
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
John ARRINGTON, Defendant Appellant.
No. 93-7360.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided: March 14, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore, J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR-89-391-JFM, CA-93-2492-JFM).
Cheryl Johns Sturm, West Chester, Pennsylvania, for Appellant.
John Vincent Geise, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Arrington, Nos. CR-89-391-JFM; CA-93-2492-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 1, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 F.3d 425, 1994 WL 83769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-arrington-ca4-1994.