United States v. John Anthony Bobo

460 F.2d 1066
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 3, 1972·No. 71-3492·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 , 2

1

. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).

2

. Appellant was convicted on two counts of transporting in interstate commerce a stolen automobile, knowing the same to have been stolen, in violation of 18 U.S. C.A. § 2312. We find no merit in his contentions that: (1) hearsay evidence was improperly admitted upon several elements of the offenses charged, (2) the court’s charge was prejudicial, (3) the court committed reversible error in commenting upon the character of appellant, and (4) the court abused its discretion in sentencing appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. John Anthony Bobo, 460 F.2d 1066 (5th Cir. 1972).

460 F.2d 1066 (United States v. John Anthony Bobo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related