United States v. John Anthony Bobo
This text of 460 F.2d 1066 (United States v. John Anthony Bobo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 , 2
. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).
. Appellant was convicted on two counts of transporting in interstate commerce a stolen automobile, knowing the same to have been stolen, in violation of 18 U.S. C.A. § 2312. We find no merit in his contentions that: (1) hearsay evidence was improperly admitted upon several elements of the offenses charged, (2) the court’s charge was prejudicial, (3) the court committed reversible error in commenting upon the character of appellant, and (4) the court abused its discretion in sentencing appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
460 F.2d 1066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-anthony-bobo-ca5-1972.