United States v. Joel Valdez-Castro
This text of 390 F. App'x 736 (United States v. Joel Valdez-Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Joel Valdez-Castro appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
*737 Valdez-Castro contends that the district court erred by determining that his prior conviction for assault with a firearm, in violation of California Penal Code § 245(a)(2), constituted a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, because section 245(a)(2) does not contain the requisite intent or use of force. These contentions are foreclosed. See United States v. Grajeda, 581 F.3d 1186, 1191-97 (9th Cir.2009); see also United States v. Heron-Salinas, 566 F.3d 898, 899 (9th Cir.2009).
Valdez-Castro also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not procedurally err and, in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, Valdez-Castro’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
390 F. App'x 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joel-valdez-castro-ca9-2010.