United States v. Joel A. Lucas

103 F.3d 121, 1996 WL 667902
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 19, 1996
Docket95-5719
StatusUnpublished

This text of 103 F.3d 121 (United States v. Joel A. Lucas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Joel A. Lucas, 103 F.3d 121, 1996 WL 667902 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

103 F.3d 121

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joel A. LUCAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-5719.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 1996.
Decided Nov. 19, 1996.

Mark E. Hall, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.

J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, Dean A. Eichelberger, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the ten-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(b) and failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Rule 4(b). The time period established by Rule 4(b) is mandatory and jurisdictional. United States v. Raynor, 939 F.2d 191, 197 (4th Cir.1991). The district court entered its judgment on September 1, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on September 12, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Raynor
939 F.2d 191 (Fourth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 F.3d 121, 1996 WL 667902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joel-a-lucas-ca4-1996.