United States v. Joe Damian Lovato

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Joe Damian Lovato

436 F.2d 1375, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12025

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 1971

Docket25979

StatusPublished

This text of 436 F.2d 1375 (United States v. Joe Damian Lovato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Joe Damian Lovato, 436 F.2d 1375, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12025 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Although there was no evidence to spare, we find there was sufficient evidence to find Lovato guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

One issue about coerced disclosure of any investigative report might be serious *1376 if there were a showing of real prejudice. The record indicates none.

The many claims of error, well presented, we find to be inadequate for a reversal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Although there was no evidence to spare, we find there was sufficient evidence to find Lovato guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

One issue about coerced disclosure of any investigative report might be serious *1376 if there were a showing of real prejudice. The record indicates none.

The many claims of error, well presented, we find to be inadequate for a reversal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

436 F.2d 1375, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joe-damian-lovato-ca9-1971.