United States v. Joe Damian Lovato

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Joe Damian Lovato

436 F.2d 1375, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12025

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 5, 1971·No. 25979·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Although there was no evidence to spare, we find there was sufficient evidence to find Lovato guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

One issue about coerced disclosure of any investigative report might be serious *1376 if there were a showing of real prejudice. The record indicates none.

The many claims of error, well presented, we find to be inadequate for a reversal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Although there was no evidence to spare, we find there was sufficient evidence to find Lovato guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

One issue about coerced disclosure of any investigative report might be serious *1376 if there were a showing of real prejudice. The record indicates none.

The many claims of error, well presented, we find to be inadequate for a reversal.

United States v. Joe Damian Lovato, 436 F.2d 1375, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12025 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

436 F.2d 1375 (United States v. Joe Damian Lovato) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.