United States v. Jimmy Lee Eng, in Re Jeremiah Casselman
This text of 527 F.2d 611 (United States v. Jimmy Lee Eng, in Re Jeremiah Casselman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
527 F.2d 611
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jimmy Lee ENG, Defendant-Appellant.
In re Jeremiah CASSELMAN.
No. 75--1444.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 15, 1976.
ORDER ASSESSING PENALTY AND REMOVING COUNSEL
Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge.
Jeremiah Casselman is removed as counsel for appellant. Another will be appointed in his stead.
For failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence, the following penalty is assessed:
Casselman will pay, personally and directly, to the court reporter or reporters the entire cost of the transcript of evidence in this case. This is to be paid within 14 days of the date of the filing of this order. A receipt or receipts for payment will be forwarded to the clerk of this court.
It is noted that the trial consumed about five days and the penalty will be substantial, but the failure was aggravated.
Order modified 530 F.2d 321.
The Honorable William J. Jameson, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
527 F.2d 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jimmy-lee-eng-in-re-jeremiah-casse-ca9-1976.