United States v. Jimmy A. Akinbiyi

829 F.2d 1121, 1987 WL 38639
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 16, 1987
Docket87-5033
StatusUnpublished

This text of 829 F.2d 1121 (United States v. Jimmy A. Akinbiyi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jimmy A. Akinbiyi, 829 F.2d 1121, 1987 WL 38639 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

829 F.2d 1121
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jimmy A. AKINBIYI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-5033.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 30, 1987.
Decided Sept. 16, 1987.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, District Judge. (CR No. 87-29-A)

Jimmy A. Akinbiyi, pro se.

Dennis Michael Kennedy, Office of the United States Department of Justice, for appellee.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After reviewing the record and other materials before us, we are convinced that the evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support Jimmy A. Akinbiyi's conviction for careless and reckless driving at an unreasonable speed, 36 C.F.R. Sec. 4.14. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979). Akinbiyi's remaining claims that he was not informed of his right to counsel or of the possible penalties if he were convicted are belied by the tape of the proceedings before the United States Magistrate. Finding no substantial question presented by this appeal, we deny Akinbiyi's request for in forma pauperis status and preparation of a transcript at government expense.

As the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
United States v. Bishop
829 F.2d 1121 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
829 F.2d 1121, 1987 WL 38639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jimmy-a-akinbiyi-ca4-1987.