United States v. Jiminez

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

November 29, 1995

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


____________________


No. 95-1457 



                                    UNITED STATES,



                                      Appellee,



                                          v.



                                   JOAQUIN JIMENEZ,



                                Defendant, Appellant.


____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND



                [Hon. Raymond J. Pettine, Senior U.S. District Judge]
                                          __________________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________

                            Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                    ____________________

                              and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
                                         _____________



                                 ____________________



            Thomas G. Briody on brief for appellant.
            ________________

            Sheldon Whitehouse,  United States Attorney,  and Craig N.  Moore,
            __________________                                _______________

        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.


____________________


____________________



Per Curiam.  We  have carefully reviewed the briefs
                      __________



            and record.  The  district court's remarks, read as  a whole,



            indicate that  regardless whether defendant's  state criminal



            offenses were  concentrated or spread out, the  court was not



            inclined  to  exercise  its  discretion  to  depart  downward



            because  the  fact remained  that  defendant  had engaged  in



            serious  misconduct.   Consequently,  we  reject  defendant's



            argument  that he was  sentenced on  the basis  of materially



            inaccurate information.



                      The judgment is summarily affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.
                                                ________


-2-