United States v. Jimenez-Victoria
This text of 76 M.J. 121 (United States v. Jimenez-Victoria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CCA 20140733. On consideration of Appellant’s motion to remand the case to the United States Army Court of [122]*122Criminal Appeals in light of newly discovered Brady evidence, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied.
Appellant’s motion to attach Defense Appellate Exhibit A, contained within the motion to remand, is impermissible under C.A.A.F. Rule 30(d) and it is also hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 M.J. 121, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jimenez-victoria-armfor-2017.