United States v. Jimenez-Salazar

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 2003
Docket02-21217
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Jimenez-Salazar (United States v. Jimenez-Salazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jimenez-Salazar, (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 15, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 02-21217 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DIANA LETICIA JIMENEZ-SALAZAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-570-3 --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court appointed counsel for Diana Leticia Jimenez-Salazar has

moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jimenez

has filed a motion requesting the appointment of new counsel and an

extension of time to investigate the merits of her appeal. Jimenez

does not raise issues for this courts review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-21217 -2-

Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. Jimenez’s motion for appointment of new counsel and for

an extension of time is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Jimenez-Salazar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jimenez-salazar-ca5-2003.