United States v. Jimenez Recio Et Al.

Supreme Court

United States v. Jimenez Recio Et Al.

537 U.S. 1185, 123 S. Ct. 1342

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 24, 2003

Docket01-1184

StatusPublished

This text of 537 U.S. 1185 (United States v. Jimenez Recio Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Jimenez Recio Et Al., 537 U.S. 1185, 123 S. Ct. 1342 (2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ante, p. 270. Motion of respondent Francisco Jimenez Recio for appointment of counsel nunc pro tunc granted, and it is ordered that M. Karl Shurtliff,.Esq., of Boise, Idaho, be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Francisco Jimenez Redo in this case. Motion of respondent Adrian Lopez-Meza for appointment of counsel nunc pro tunc granted, and it is ordered that Thomas A. Sullivan, Esq., of Caldwell, Idaho, be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Adrian Lopez-Meza in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ante, p. 270. Motion of respondent Francisco Jimenez Recio for appointment of counsel nunc pro tunc granted, and it is ordered that M. Karl Shurtliff,.Esq., of Boise, Idaho, be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Francisco Jimenez Redo in this case. Motion of respondent Adrian Lopez-Meza for appointment of counsel nunc pro tunc granted, and it is ordered that Thomas A. Sullivan, Esq., of Caldwell, Idaho, be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Adrian Lopez-Meza in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 U.S. 1185, 123 S. Ct. 1342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jimenez-recio-et-al-scotus-2003.