United States v. Jimenez
This text of 97 F. App'x 768 (United States v. Jimenez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Edgar Javier Jimenez appeals his 15-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his term of supervised release. Jimenez was convicted of importing marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Jimenez has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Jimenez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 F. App'x 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jimenez-ca9-2004.