United States v. Jimarus Puckett

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: June 16, 2026
• Docket: 25-3359
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 25-3359 ___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jimarus Westley Puckett

Defendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern ____________

Submitted: June 11, 2026 Filed: June 16, 2026 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SMITH, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Jimarus Puckett received a 72-month sentence after he pleaded guilty to a firearm offense. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), (9), 924(a)(8). An Anders brief suggests that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We conclude otherwise. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461– 62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion). The record establishes that the district court 1 sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment. See United States v. McDaniels, 19 F.4th 1065, 1067 (8th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (explaining that the district court has “latitude to weigh the relevant sentencing factors . . . differently than a defendant would have preferred” (citation omitted)).

We have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83 (1988). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel permission to withdraw. ______________________________

1 The Honorable C.J. Williams, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. -2-