United States v. Jihad Muhammad Ali

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 21-13498 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 02/21/2023 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-13498 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JIHAD MUHAMMAD ALI, a.k.a. Abu Dujanah,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cr-20109-JLK-1 USCA11 Case: 21-13498 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 02/21/2023 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 21-13498

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Mark C. Katzef, appointed counsel for Jihad Muhammad Ali in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Ali’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED in part. However, because the district court’s oral pro- nouncement at sentencing did not require Ali to undergo mental health treatment while on supervised release, it differed from the written judgment, which did include such a requirement. Accord- ingly, we VACATE in part and REMAND the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to correct the record and en- ter a judgment consistent with the oral pronouncement. See United States v. Chavez, 204 F.3d 1305, 1316 (11th Cir. 2000).