United States v. Jesus Salas, Jr.

429 F. App'x 425

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: June 21, 2011
• Docket: 10-11171
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jesus Salas, Jr., presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Shabazz, 633 F.3d 342, 345-46 (5th Cir.2011), which held that the phrase “on any such revocation” in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) does not impose an aggregate limit on imprisonment for revocation of supervised release but limits only the amount of imprisonment that may be imposed each time a court revokes a defendant’s supervised release. He raises the arguments solely to preserve them for further review. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motions to dismiss and for an extension of time to file a brief are DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.