United States v. Jesus Pacheco

599 F. App'x 809
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 2015
Docket14-10093
StatusUnpublished

This text of 599 F. App'x 809 (United States v. Jesus Pacheco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jesus Pacheco, 599 F. App'x 809 (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Pacheco appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 80-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Pacheco contends that the district court clearly erred by denying him a minor role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). In light of the very large quantity of methamphetamine and Pacheco’s conduct over the course of several days, including storing methamphetamine at his home, the district court did not clearly err. See United States v. Hurtado, 760 F.3d 1065, 1068-69 (9th Cir.2014); United States v. Rodriguez-Castro, 641 F.3d 1189, 1193 (9th Cir.2011); United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1282-83 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Rodriguez-Castro
641 F.3d 1189 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Hector Hurtado
760 F.3d 1065 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Cantrell
433 F.3d 1269 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
599 F. App'x 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jesus-pacheco-ca9-2015.