United States v. Jesus Martinez, Jr.
This text of 638 F. App'x 401 (United States v. Jesus Martinez, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The attorney appointed to represent Johnny Cox, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v, California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Cox has not filed a response. Although Cox remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed the term of imprisonment imposed upon the revocation of his probation. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivólous issue for appellate • review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw, is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5,- the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in ,5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
638 F. App'x 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jesus-martinez-jr-ca5-2016.