United States v. Jesus Leyva-Villalobos

872 F.2d 335, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5427, 1989 WL 38386
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 24, 1989·No. 89-50116·Published

Opinion

On January 24, 1989, the district court denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the indictment and disqualify the special Assistant United States Attorney, finding that neither Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(d) nor 6(e) had been violated. On January 24, 1989, appellant filed a timely interlocutory appeal under United States v. Benjamin, 812 F.2d 548 (9th Cir.), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied (1987).

On March 28, 1989, the Supreme Court held that an order denying a motion to dismiss an indictment for an alleged violation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e) is not immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1494, 103 L.Ed.2d 879. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jesus Leyva-Villalobos, 872 F.2d 335, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5427, 1989 WL 38386 (9th Cir. 1989).

872 F.2d 335 (United States v. Jesus Leyva-Villalobos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States
489 U.S. 794 (Supreme Court, 1989)
United States v. Benjamin
812 F.2d 548 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)