United States v. Jesus Gonzalez

590 F. App'x 719
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 27, 2015
Docket14-50167
StatusUnpublished

This text of 590 F. App'x 719 (United States v. Jesus Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jesus Gonzalez, 590 F. App'x 719 (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Rodriguez Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rodriguez Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Rodriguez Gonzalez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal; therefore, we affirm Rodriguez Gonzalez’s conviction and sentence.

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. *720 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1826(b)(2). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to section 1326(b)(2)).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Pablo Rivera-Sanchez
222 F.3d 1057 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Juan Carlos Herrera-Blanco
232 F.3d 715 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
590 F. App'x 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jesus-gonzalez-ca9-2015.