United States v. Jesus Esquivel

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 10, 2018
Docket18-50060
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Jesus Esquivel (United States v. Jesus Esquivel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jesus Esquivel, (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 18-50060 Document: 00514676816 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/10/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals

No. 18-50060 Fifth Circuit

FILED Conference Calendar October 10, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS HUMBERTO ESQUIVEL,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:17-CR-220-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Humberto Esquivel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Esquivel has not filed a response. While counsel addresses the validity of the appeal waiver in Esquivel’s plea agreement, counsel does not discuss the district court’s compliance with

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-50060 Document: 00514676816 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/10/2018

No. 18-50060

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. An appellate waiver does not waive the district court’s compliance with Rule 11 or the need for counsel to brief the issue adequately in an Anders brief. See United States v. Carreon-Ibarra, 673 F.3d 358, 362 n.3 (5th Cir. 2012); United States v. Brown, 328 F.3d 787, 789- 90 (5th Cir. 2003). However, our independent review confirms that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. We thus concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Therefore, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Brown
328 F.3d 787 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Eduardo Carreon-Ibarra
673 F.3d 358 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Jesus Esquivel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jesus-esquivel-ca5-2018.