United States v. Jesus Eduardo Duarte Camacho

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJuly 9, 2020
Docket18-14880
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Jesus Eduardo Duarte Camacho (United States v. Jesus Eduardo Duarte Camacho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jesus Eduardo Duarte Camacho, (11th Cir. 2020).

Opinion

Case: 18-14880 Date Filed: 07/09/2020 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 18-14880 ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:18-cr-00013-HLM-WEJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS EDUARDO DUARTE CAMACHO,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________

(July 9, 2020)

Before WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and CORRIGAN,∗ District Judge.

∗ Honorable Timothy J. Corrigan, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. Case: 18-14880 Date Filed: 07/09/2020 Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Jesus Eduardo Duarte Camacho appeals his 210-month sentence for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at least 500 grams of

methamphetamine, possession with intent to distribute at least 500 grams of

methamphetamine, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking

crime. On appeal, he argues that the district court erred at sentencing when it

denied a minor-role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. After reviewing the record

and the briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the district

court did not clearly err in denying Camacho’s request for a minor-role reduction.

See United States v. Bernal-Benitez, 594 F.3d 1303, 1320 (11th Cir. 2010) (stating

that we review a district court’s denial of a role reduction for clear error).

Therefore, we affirm Camacho’s sentence.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bernal-Benitez
594 F.3d 1303 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Jesus Eduardo Duarte Camacho, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jesus-eduardo-duarte-camacho-ca11-2020.