United States v. Jessup

63 F. App'x 353
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 15, 2003·No. No. 01-50666·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Tony Steven Jessup appeals the sentence imposed upon revocation of his term of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Jessup contends that 18 U.S.C. § 3583, which authorizes imposition of a term of supervised release upon revocation of a prior term of supervised release, is unconstitutional as applied under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2001). This contention is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Liero, 298 F.3d 1175, 1178 (9th Cir.2002).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jessup, 63 F. App'x 353 (9th Cir. 2003).

63 F. App'x 353 (United States v. Jessup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Jose Romero Liero
298 F.3d 1175 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)