United States v. Jessie Ivory

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 24-1209

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jessie Ivory, also known as Jesse Holliday

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

Submitted: April 24, 2024 Filed: April 29, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Jessie Ivory appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to a term of imprisonment within the advisory Sentencing Guidelines

1 The Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

range. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

We conclude that the sentence was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Valure, 835 F.3d 789, 790 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review). There is no indication that the district court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (considerations for reasonableness of sentence); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (sentence within Guidelines range presumptively reasonable).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment.

______________________________