United States v. Jerry Lee Imes, Jr.
91 F.3d 1210, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5191, 96 Daily Journal DAR 8384, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17130, 1996 WL 381897
Opinion
ORDER
The opinion and dissent filed April 5,1996, slip op. 4175, and reported at 80 F.3d 1309 (9th Cir.1996), are withdrawn in light of the parties’ agreement that the conviction should be vacated because the jury was erroneously instructed. A memorandum disposition is filed in their place, and the petition for re *1211 hearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are dismissed as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jerry Lee Imes, Jr., 91 F.3d 1210, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5191, 96 Daily Journal DAR 8384, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17130, 1996 WL 381897 (9th Cir. 1996).
91 F.3d 1210 (United States v. Jerry Lee Imes, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mika GERGEN, Defendant-Appellant
172 F.3d 719 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Darrell Regans, Also Known as Kevin Price
125 F.3d 685 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Darrell Regans
Eighth Circuit, 1997
United States v. Vance S. Patterson
97 F.3d 192 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Wesley B. Dewalt
92 F.3d 1209 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6094, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9962 United States of America v. Miguel Polanco
93 F.3d 555 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Polanco
93 F.3d 545 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)