United States v. Jerome T. Schiefen, Barbara Schiefen, Estate of South Lincoln Rural Water System, Inc. David Schiefen Krautco, Uninc

81 F.3d 166, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20659, 1996 WL 148566
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 3, 1996
Docket95-3472
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 F.3d 166 (United States v. Jerome T. Schiefen, Barbara Schiefen, Estate of South Lincoln Rural Water System, Inc. David Schiefen Krautco, Uninc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jerome T. Schiefen, Barbara Schiefen, Estate of South Lincoln Rural Water System, Inc. David Schiefen Krautco, Uninc, 81 F.3d 166, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20659, 1996 WL 148566 (8th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

81 F.3d 166

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Jerome T. SCHIEFEN, Appellant,
Barbara SCHIEFEN, Estate of; South Lincoln Rural Water
System, Inc.; David Schiefen; Krautco, Uninc, Defendants.

No. 95-3472.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 19, 1996.
Filed: April 3, 1996.

Before McMILLIAN, BRIGHT, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jerome Schiefen appeals from the final order of the District Court1 for the District of South Dakota, granting the United States summary judgment in this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1345, seeking foreclosure of liens held by the Internal Revenue Service and Farmers Home Administration, the sale of property, and the distribution of proceeds. The district court also concluded certain transfers of real and personal property were fraudulent conveyances. Schiefen argues the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain this suit. We have carefully reviewed the record, and we conclude Schiefen's arguments on appeal are frivolous and entirely without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). Schiefen's several motions on appeal are denied.

1

The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beaner v. United States
361 F. Supp. 2d 1063 (D. South Dakota, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 F.3d 166, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20659, 1996 WL 148566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jerome-t-schiefen-barbara-schiefen-estate-of-south-ca8-1996.