United States v. Jerome Atilus

425 F.2d 816, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9282
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 12, 1970
Docket27957
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 425 F.2d 816 (United States v. Jerome Atilus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jerome Atilus, 425 F.2d 816, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9282 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Atilus was convicted in 1964 for illegally possessing and transporting marihuana in violation of 26 U.S. C.A. §§ 4744(a) and 4742(a). His appeal from that conviction was delayed, and as a result the propriety of this 1964 conviction is now before us for the first time on direct appeal. 1

It appears that through no fault of the defendant a transcript of the trial proceedings is no longer available. Under these circumstances this court has no choice but to reverse the conviction. The Supreme Court has made it clear beyond question that a criminal defendant has a right to a complete transcript of the trial proceedings, particularly where, as here, counsel on appeal was not counsel at the trial. Hardy v. United States, 1963, 375 U.S. 277, 84 S.Ct. 424, 11 L.Ed.2d 331. Since no transcript is here available, the conviction must be reversed. Further, since *817 Atilus has already completely served the sentence imposed as a result of the conviction, a retrial would be pointless.

The judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause is remanded for the entry of appropriate orders to expunge the records of this conviction.

Reversed and remanded.

1

. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the Clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part. I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Louisiana v. Desmond Dangelo Dugas
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2022
State of Louisiana v. Erick Gail Gragg
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2022
State of Louisiana v. Darious D. Rogers
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013
Freeman v. United States
60 A.3d 434 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
State v. Molere
99 So. 3d 1050 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
State v. Higginbotham
60 So. 3d 621 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2011)
Moore v. State
66 So. 3d 295 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2010)
State v. Landry
751 So. 2d 214 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1999)
State v. Gonzales
680 So. 2d 1253 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
United States v. Pace
10 F.3d 1106 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
State v. Murphy
613 So. 2d 778 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)
State v. Williams, No. Jd Sn-2807 (Aug. 11, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 7534 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)
State v. Lyons
597 So. 2d 593 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1992)
Ex Parte Godbolt
546 So. 2d 991 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1987)
Isom v. State
497 So. 2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
White v. State
403 So. 2d 287 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
State v. McFarland
287 N.W.2d 162 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1980)
United States v. Henry Selva
546 F.2d 1173 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
State v. Ford
338 So. 2d 107 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
United States v. James Edward Pigg
471 F.2d 843 (Seventh Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
425 F.2d 816, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jerome-atilus-ca5-1970.