United States v. Jerome A. Susskind (91-1003), James J. Rumler (91-1004), Scott Nickerson (91-1005)

975 F.2d 1206, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23374

Opinion

975 F.2d 1206

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jerome A. SUSSKIND (91-1003), James J. Rumler (91-1004),
Scott Nickerson (91-1005), Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 91-1003 to 91-1005.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 4, 1992.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SURHREINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and these cases are restored to the docket as pending appeals.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule the cases for oral argument as soon as practicable.