United States v. Jermaine McClelland

574 F. App'x 761
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 2014
Docket13-50082
StatusUnpublished

This text of 574 F. App'x 761 (United States v. Jermaine McClelland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jermaine McClelland, 574 F. App'x 761 (9th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The district court lacked authority to impose a sentence below the mandatory minimum. See United States v. Wipf, 620 F.3d 1168, 1170-71 (9th Cir.2010). Because McClelland had three criminal history points, he was ineligible for safety valve relief. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). Whether the district court believed that McClel-land’s criminal history category substantially over-represented the seriousness of his criminal history is irrelevant because “district courts have no authority to adjust criminal history points for the purpose of determining eligibility for safety valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1).” United States v. Hernandez-Castro, 473 F.3d 1004, 1008 (9th Cir.2007). We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resen-tencing.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wipf
620 F.3d 1168 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Esteban Hernandez-Castro
473 F.3d 1004 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
574 F. App'x 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jermaine-mcclelland-ca9-2014.