United States v. Jermaine Brown

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 25, 2025
Docket24-3319
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Jermaine Brown (United States v. Jermaine Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jermaine Brown, (8th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 24-3319 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jermaine Terrance Brown, also known as Bo Bo

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________

Submitted: April 22, 2025 Filed: April 25, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Jermaine Brown appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 12 months in prison, with no supervised release to follow. His

1 The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the revocation sentence. See United States v. Valure, 835 F.3d 789, 790 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review). There is no indication that the court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923-24 (8th Cir. 2006) (revocation sentence may be unreasonable if district court fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment). Moreover, the revocation sentence is within the Guidelines range and accorded a presumption of substantive reasonableness on appeal. See United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Duane Larison
432 F.3d 921 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Perkins
526 F.3d 1107 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Tonney Valure
835 F.3d 789 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Jermaine Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jermaine-brown-ca8-2025.