United States v. Jermaine Brown

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7223

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JERMAINE BROWN, a/k/a Jeezy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10; 4:13-cv-00041- RBS)

Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine Elizabeth Wolfe, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia; Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Brown appeals from the district court’s orders

construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on

that basis, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Brown, Nos. 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10;

4:13-cv-00041-RBS (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2015; June 8, 2015). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED