United States v. Jerkins

76 M.J. 174, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 256
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided March 21, 2017·No. No. 17-0203/AR·Published

Opinion

CCA 20140071. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HER DISCRETION BY ALLOWING A GENERAL OFFICER MEMORANDUM OF REPRIMAND INTO SENTENCING EVIDENCE WHERE THE REPRIMAND WAS ISSUED TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE COURT-MARTIAL AND CONTAINED HIGHLY PREJUDICIAL AND MISLEADING LANGUAGE.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jerkins, 76 M.J. 174, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 256 (Ark. 2017).

76 M.J. 174 (United States v. Jerkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.