United States v. Jeremy C. Conn

119 F. App'x 846
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 19, 2005·No. 04-2579·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy C. Conn pleaded guilty to drug charges and was sentenced to eighty-four months in prison. In this appeal, Conn’s attorney has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing the district court should have departed downward from the otherwise applicable Sentencing Guidelines range because Conn’s criminal history score overrepresented his criminal propensities. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3(b). This argument fails because the district court’s discretionary refusal to depart downward is not reviewable on appeal. United States v. Parks, 364 F.3d 902, 906 (8th Cir.2004). Conn has filed a pro se supplemental brief and his pro se arguments also fail. Having reviewed the Anders brief, Conn’s supplemental brief, and the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues and thus affirm. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and deny Conn’s pro se motion for copies of discovery and grand jury transcripts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jeremy C. Conn, 119 F. App'x 846 (8th Cir. 2005).

119 F. App'x 846 (United States v. Jeremy C. Conn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Joshua Parks
364 F.3d 902 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)