United States v. Jenkins

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Jenkins

22 C.M.A. 311

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedMay 25, 1973

DocketNo. 26,482

StatusPublished

This text of 22 C.M.A. 311 (United States v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Jenkins, 22 C.M.A. 311 (cma 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We granted review on the following issue:

Whether the military judge erred when he ruled that Prosecution Exhibit 1 (104 vials of heroin) was not obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure.

This case is the companion case to United States v Simmons, 22 USCMA 288, 46 CMR 288 (1973), decided this date. For the reasons set out in our opinions in that case, we affirm the' decision of the Army Court of Military Review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We granted review on the following issue:

Whether the military judge erred when he ruled that Prosecution Exhibit 1 (104 vials of heroin) was not obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure.

This case is the companion case to United States v Simmons, 22 USCMA 288, 46 CMR 288 (1973), decided this date. For the reasons set out in our opinions in that case, we affirm the' decision of the Army Court of Military Review.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 C.M.A. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jenkins-cma-1973.