United States v. Jenkins

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Jenkins

22 C.M.A. 311

United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided May 25, 1973·No. No. 26,482·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We granted review on the following issue:

Whether the military judge erred when he ruled that Prosecution Exhibit 1 (104 vials of heroin) was not obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure.

This case is the companion case to United States v Simmons, 22 USCMA 288, 46 CMR 288 (1973), decided this date. For the reasons set out in our opinions in that case, we affirm the' decision of the Army Court of Military Review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We granted review on the following issue:

Whether the military judge erred when he ruled that Prosecution Exhibit 1 (104 vials of heroin) was not obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure.

This case is the companion case to United States v Simmons, 22 USCMA 288, 46 CMR 288 (1973), decided this date. For the reasons set out in our opinions in that case, we affirm the' decision of the Army Court of Military Review.

United States v. Jenkins, 22 C.M.A. 311 (cma 1973).

Pincite

22 C.M.A. 311 (United States v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.