United States v. Jehudijah Woods

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: August 14, 2024
• Docket: 22-11681
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 22-11681 Document: 38-1 Date Filed: 08/14/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-11681 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEHUDIJAH UZZIEL WOODS, a.k.a. Jehudijah Woods,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:21-cr-00015-AKK-JHE-1 USCA11 Case: 22-11681 Document: 38-1 Date Filed: 08/14/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 22-11681

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The government’s motion to dismiss this appeal as untimely is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. Jehudijah Woods’s notice of appeal, deemed filed on May 12, 2022, is untimely to ap- peal from the district court’s February 18, 2022 final criminal judg- ment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A) (providing that a defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 14 days after entry of the ap- pealed judgment or order); Jeffries v. United States, 748 F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014) (providing that a pro se prisoner’s notice of appeal is deemed filed on the date he delivers it to prison authori- ties for mailing); United States v. Lopez, 562 F.3d 1309, 1312-13 (11th Cir. 2009) (holding that the time limit in Rule 4(b)(1)(A) is a non-ju- risdictional claims-processing rule that we must enforce if raised by the government). The government did not forfeit its ability to chal- lenge the timeliness of this appeal because it moved to dismiss the appeal as untimely prior to filing its appellate merits brief. See Lopez, 562 F.3d at 1313-14. Further, because Woods’s notice of ap- peal was filed outside of the 30-day period after the expiration of the initial 14-day appeal period, he is not eligible for relief under Rule 4(b)(4). See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); Lopez, 562 F.3d at 1314.