United States v. Jeffrey Tarrats

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jeffrey Tarrats. Read the opinion of the Court — 435 F. App'x 185
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 12, 2014·No. 14-6056·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6056

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JEFFREY TARRATS, a/k/a Skip, a/k/a Ozzy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-7)

Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 12, 2014

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Tarrats, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Tarrats appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to correct clerical error under Fed. R. Crim.

P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Tarrats, No. 2:04-cr-

00016-RAJ-JEB-7 (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 2013). We grant leave to

proceed under the Criminal Justice Act. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jeffrey Tarrats, (4th Cir. 2014).

United States v. Jeffrey Tarrats (United States v. Jeffrey Tarrats) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.