United States v. Jeffrey Tarrats
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6056
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY TARRATS, a/k/a Skip, a/k/a Ozzy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-7)
Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 12, 2014
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Tarrats, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Tarrats appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to correct clerical error under Fed. R. Crim.
P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Tarrats, No. 2:04-cr-
00016-RAJ-JEB-7 (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 2013). We grant leave to
proceed under the Criminal Justice Act. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jeffrey Tarrats (United States v. Jeffrey Tarrats) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.