United States v. Jeffrey Martinovich

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jeffrey Martinovich. Read the opinion of the Court — 810 F.3d 232
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2014·No. 14-7159·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7159

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JEFFREY A. MARTINOVICH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:12-cr-00101-RGD-TEM-1)

Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 18, 2014

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey A. Martinovich, Appellant Pro Se. V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia; Scott W. Putney, Norfolk, Virginia; Brian James Samuels, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey A. Martinovich appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for leave to file an amended brief. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Martinovich, No. 4:12-cr-00101-RGD-TEM-

1 (E.D. Va. July 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jeffrey Martinovich, (4th Cir. 2014).

United States v. Jeffrey Martinovich (United States v. Jeffrey Martinovich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.