United States v. Jeffrey MacDonald
This text of United States v. Jeffrey MacDonald (United States v. Jeffrey MacDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7543
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY R. MACDONALD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (3:75-cr-00026-F-1)
Submitted: March 22, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey R. MacDonald, Appellant Pro Se. John Stuart Bruce, Acting United States Attorney, Leslie Katherine Cooley, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Brian Michael Murtagh, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey R. MacDonald appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for additional DNA testing pursuant to the
Innocence Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3600 to 3600A (2012). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. MacDonald, No. 3:75-cr-00026-F-1
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Jeffrey MacDonald, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jeffrey-macdonald-ca4-2016.