United States v. Jeffrey MacDonald

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jeffrey MacDonald. Read the opinion of the Court — 911 F.3d 723
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2016·No. 14-7543·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7543

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JEFFREY R. MACDONALD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (3:75-cr-00026-F-1)

Submitted: March 22, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey R. MacDonald, Appellant Pro Se. John Stuart Bruce, Acting United States Attorney, Leslie Katherine Cooley, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Brian Michael Murtagh, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey R. MacDonald appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for additional DNA testing pursuant to the

Innocence Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3600 to 3600A (2012). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. MacDonald, No. 3:75-cr-00026-F-1

(E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jeffrey MacDonald, (4th Cir. 2016).

United States v. Jeffrey MacDonald (United States v. Jeffrey MacDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DNA testing
18 U.S.C. § 3600